PFAS in Drinking Water: The Silent Crisis No One Told You About

Imagine waking up one day to find out the water you’ve been drinking, cooking with, and bathing in contains toxic chemicals scientists are now comparing to cigarettes in terms of long-term health risks. Imagine learning that corporations have spent billions of dollars to quietly settle lawsuits rather than face the scrutiny of open court. Imagine realising that governments worldwide are scrambling to rewrite safety standards because they’ve just admitted they had it dangerously wrong for decades.

This isn’t a hypothetical. This is happening right now.

A Chemical Crisis Decades in the Making

For nearly a century, PFAS (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances)—often called “forever chemicals” due to their inability to break down in nature or the human body—have been used in everything from non-stick cookware to food packaging, raincoats, cosmetics, and even firefighting foams. What started as a marvel of modern chemistry has now been exposed as one of the biggest environmental and health disasters of our time.

And it’s not just in products—it’s in your water.

Australia’s Drinking Water Guidelines: A 94% Reduction in “Safe” Limits

In April 2024, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) was forced to slash the acceptable PFAS limits in drinking water—dramatically tightening the guidelines after years of downplaying the risks.

The numbers are staggering:

• PFOA: Reduced from 560 nanograms per litre (ng/L) to 200 ng/L (64% stricter)
• PFOS: Cut from 70 ng/L to 4 ng/L (94% reduction)
• PFHxS: Newly regulated at 30 ng/L
• PFBS: Now capped at 1000 ng/L

Let’s be clear: If a 94% reduction is required to “meet safety standards” in 2024, what does that say about what people have been consuming for decades? The reality is, these chemicals should never have been allowed in our drinking water to begin with.

Corporations Are Settling—Because They Know They’d Lose in Court

The real wake-up call isn’t just the government regulations—it’s the corporate panic.

• 3M, one of the world’s largest PFAS producers, agreed to pay up to $12.5 billion in 2023 to settle water contamination lawsuits in the U.S.
• DuPont, Chemours, and Corteva paid $1.19 billion to avoid trial over PFAS contamination.
• Thinx, a company selling supposedly "safe" period underwear, quietly settled a PFAS lawsuit for millions—after their "organic" products were found to contain the very chemicals they claimed to be free of.

These aren’t admissions of innocence—they are damage control. Corporations don’t shell out billions if they believe they can win. They pay to make the problem go away before it explodes into a bigger scandal.

And the lawsuits are just beginning. Across Europe and the U.S., local councils are suing manufacturers for the cost of removing PFAS from public water systems, a burden taxpayers never signed up for.

The New Cancer Connection: The Next Cigarette Industry?

For years, PFAS health risks were buried under industry-funded research. Now, independent studies are showing what many feared:

• PFAS exposure is now linked to increased risks of cancer, including:
  • Kidney and testicular cancer
  • Breast and ovarian cancer
  • Thyroid and prostate cancer
• Scientists are comparing PFAS to smoking, pointing out that in the 1950s, tobacco companies denied the links between cigarettes and cancer—just as chemical companies have done with PFAS.
• The CDC and EPA in the U.S. have found PFAS in the blood of 97% of Americans—and Australian data is likely just as alarming.

If the science is following the exact same playbook that exposed cigarettes as deadly, how long before governments are forced to ban these chemicals entirely?

The Invisible Threat: How PFAS Travels Through the Air

Most people assume PFAS is only a problem in water—but it’s also in the air.

New research suggests fluorinated carbon compounds can be released into the atmosphere via air conditioning systems and industrial emissions. These airborne particles travel long distances, meaning PFAS contamination isn’t just a problem near chemical plants or military bases. It's in the clouds. 

There is evidence that fluorinated gases (F-gases) used in air conditioning and refrigeration systems can degrade into trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), a persistent and mobile type of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS), which subsequently contaminates water sources through atmospheric processes such as rainfall. ​

A Delayed Reaction: Australia’s Failure to Act Sooner

For decades, the Australian government ignored the warnings that countries like the U.S., Canada, and the EU acted on years ago. Only now, as the lawsuits pile up and global standards tighten, is Australia playing catch-up.

But even the new stricter regulations still don’t align with international best practices. The U.S. EPA’s new guidelines limit PFOS and PFOA to 4 parts per trillion (ppt)—a fraction of Australia’s new limits.

If the U.S. considers anything above 4 ppt to be a health risk, why is Australia’s limit still 50 times higher?

The Inevitable Question: What Will You Do?

For years, governments and corporations told us lead in gasoline was fine—until it wasn’t.
They told us smoking wasn’t harmful—until it was.
They told us PFAS levels in drinking water were safe—until they weren’t.

Now, those same corporations are paying billions to avoid trials. Governments are racing to fix their mistakes. Scientists are sounding the alarm louder than ever.

The question isn’t if PFAS is a problem. It’s how much longer you’re willing to wait before doing something about it.

Save $30 when you shop the #1 PFAS Water Filter + Benchtop Housing here